Apprenticeship Curriculum Intent, Implementation and Impact
Curriculum Intent, Implementation and Impact is to be a core feature of the Quality of Education judgement in the new Education Inspection Framework.
Curriculum Intent, Implementation and Impact is to be a core feature of the Quality of Education judgement in the new Education Inspection Framework.
After the publication of the new OfSTED Education Inspection Framework 2019, education and training providers will be aware of the new Quality of Education judgement. This judgement has been introduced to focus on the curriculum, which sets out what apprentices need to know and be able to do.
OfSTED’s definition of a curriculum is
The curriculum is a framework for setting out the aims of a programme of education, including the knowledge and skills to be gained at each stage (intent); for translating that framework over time into a structure and narrative, within an institutional context (implementation) and for evaluating what knowledge and skills learners have gained against expectations (impact/achievement).
The curriculum is made up of 3 distinct parts:
Education and training providers must be clear that curriculum intent is not a list of your curriculum aims published in a document or website.
Curriculum intent is:
a framework for setting out the aims of a programme of education, including the knowledge and understanding gained at each stage
A framework of aims is very different from a bullet point list of aims
Essentially, the intent is to determine what you want learners to do and why.
When considering a curriculum intent framework, education and training providers need to ensure the following:
the translation of that framework over time into a structure and narrative, within an institutional context
The next stage in the Quality of Education judgement is considering how education and training providers demonstrate their implementation. Like curriculum intent, this cannot be covered by a statement in a document or posted to a website.
Inspectors will use various methods to judge curriculum implementation; a statement will not be sufficient.
Inspectors will want to see the following:
When considering a curriculum implementation, education and training providers need to ensure the following:
the evaluation of what knowledge and skills learners have gained against expectations
Finally, education and training providers will need to address curriculum impact and be clear that the whole purpose of the Quality of Education judgement is for inspectors to focus more on the curriculum and less on the generation, analysis and interpretation of performance data. Inspectors will be interested in the conclusions drawn and actions taken from internal assessment information but will not examine or verify that information first-hand.
To make their judgement, inspectors will look at the following:
When considering curriculum implementation, education and training providers need to ensure the following:
Providers must consider their curriculum intent, implementation, and impact when developing an apprenticeship programme (standards).
As well as the detailed questions set out in the sections above, there are general questions that should be asked throughout the curriculum design process:
The first step in designing the curriculum plan is identifying the apprenticeship standard's knowledge, skills, and behaviours. These standards set out the endpoints that learners will be working towards. However, when designing the curriculum, the intent, implementation and impact cannot be done in isolation. Providers must first determine the performance measures for each outcome to demonstrate impact. This should be a four-step process: state what will be delivered or what the apprentices will need to do, identify the measure type that will be used, define the performance benchmark, and finally, schedule when the outcome will be implemented or completed.
For each knowledge, skill, or behaviour in the apprenticeship standard, providers should be able to show what they are delivering to develop the KSB and how they will determine whether the learners have absorbed and retained what has been taught.
What types of measures can providers use?
There is a wide range of performance measures that providers can use, such as:
Once education and training providers have identified the outcomes, what will be delivered, and how learning will be assessed, the curriculum sequence will be created. Inspectors will make a judgement on this:
how carefully leaders have thought about the sequence of teaching knowledge and skills to build on what learners already know and can do.
Like curriculum intent statements, the curriculum sequence cannot just be a vague timetable added to a document or web page.
There needs to be detailed about what is being delivered, when it is being delivered, and why it is being delivered. Inspectors will check how “leaders have ensured that a subject curriculum includes content that has been identified as most useful and that this content is taught in a logical progression, systematically and explicitly for all learners to acquire the intended knowledge, skills and behaviours.”
There must be detail – What is the activity? What will apprentices learn? How does it build on previous learning? Is the learning in a logical order? Which outcomes or endpoints are being covered? What learning material will be used? What assessment is planned?
Inspectors will also focus on how the curriculum is taught at the subject, classroom, or workshop level. They will want to see teaching examples and expect examples of teaching materials, such as PowerPoint, e-learning, assessments, and workbooks.
The development of learning and teaching material is key to successful delivery. It must be relevant to the curriculum activity and the intended learning outcomes. The quality of the material has to meet learner expectations. If staff cannot create a suitable PowerPoint presentation, then there is a clear indicator that additional CPD might be needed. How well do learners enjoy lessons or workshops? Do you get learner reviews at the end of a session? Do you perform observations of teaching, learning, and assessment? How do we make sure that staff have the skills to deliver workshops?
Providers also need to review eLearning quality and, in some cases, introduce it to their programmes. What sort of eLearning system do you use? Is content Scorm or Tin Can? How can you track learning and progress? Do you need a Learning Record Store to dive deeper into apprenticeship learning and activities? Can it be used on mobile devices? Have you considered gamification to encourage learner engagement? How do you give feedback to learners? How does staff feedback support learner development? What do you use to award grades to learners?
When inspectors evaluate the impact of the education provided to learners, they will focus on what learners have learned and the skills they have gained and can apply.
If the curriculum intent planning has been done correctly, then the delivery staff will already have identified the outcomes (endpoints) that need to be achieved and the performance measures that will be used to determine success.
To measure the curriculum's impact, staff must review performance cyclically, usually annually.
Where apprenticeship providers run rolling programmes, they must determine a suitable cut-off point for their reviews.
The review process should follow the format:
The review of the performance measures has to have a purpose in the improvement of the curriculum. Each performance measure must be worked through, and staff must add their findings and recommendations.
Where findings need improvement, the reviewers should add this to a programme action plan. The action plan is key to improving the curriculum and overall delivery.
In conclusion, the new OfSTED Education Inspection Framework 2019 places a significant emphasis on the quality of education, with a particular focus on the curriculum. This framework underscores the need for education and training providers to meticulously consider their apprenticeship curricula' intent, implementation, and impact.
The intent of the curriculum must be clear and comprehensive, establishing the aims and objectives of the educational programme. It should not merely be a list of aims but a well-thought-out framework detailing what learners need to know and the skills they need to acquire at each stage of their learning. This involves planning and sequencing the curriculum to build on previous knowledge and skills, addressing the needs of learners, employers, and the broader economic context.
Implementation requires translating the curriculum framework into a structured and coherent narrative within the institutional context. This involves ensuring teaching staff have the expertise and support to deliver the curriculum effectively. The curriculum should enable learners to understand key concepts, apply their knowledge fluently, and build towards defined endpoints. Effective assessment methods should be employed to check learners' understanding and inform teaching practices.
Impact focuses on evaluating the knowledge and skills learners have gained against expectations. Inspectors will look for evidence of learner progress, attainment, and the application of acquired knowledge and skills. The curriculum should be well-constructed and well-taught, leading to good results and preparing learners for their next stage of education, training, or employment. It is essential that the curriculum also addresses the needs of disadvantaged learners and those with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), ensuring they acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to succeed.
In developing an apprenticeship programme, providers must continually address these aspects—intent, implementation, and impact—throughout the curriculum design process. They must determine what will be taught, how it will be taught, and how it will be sequenced. This includes identifying the knowledge, skills, and behaviours apprentices need to acquire, developing appropriate teaching and learning materials, and implementing robust assessment and review processes.
Adhering to these principles allows education and training providers to ensure that their apprenticeship programmes are effective, comprehensive, and aligned with the needs of learners and the wider economy. This holistic approach enhances the quality of education and equips apprentices with the skills and knowledge they need to succeed in their careers.
The Quality of Education judgement, introduced in the OfSTED 2019 Framework, focuses on evaluating the curriculum through three key areas: intent (the framework of aims for knowledge and skills), implementation (how the curriculum is taught and sequenced), and impact (the evaluation of learners’ acquired knowledge and skills against expectations). It ensures apprenticeship programmes are comprehensive and aligned with learner and employer needs.
Curriculum intent is a framework outlining the aims of an apprenticeship programme, detailing the knowledge, skills, and behaviours apprentices need to progress to the next stage of education, training, or employment. Providers must ensure the curriculum is ambitious, sequenced logically, and responsive to local, regional, and national economic needs, particularly for disadvantaged learners or those with SEND.
Curriculum implementation involves translating the curriculum intent into a structured, coherent programme within an institutional context. This includes ensuring staff have expert subject knowledge, use effective teaching methods to embed key concepts, and employ assessments to check understanding and inform teaching, enabling apprentices to build on prior learning and work towards defined endpoints.
Curriculum impact is evaluated by assessing what knowledge and skills apprentices have gained against expectations. Inspectors examine learner attainment, progress, destination data, and evidence of applied knowledge through conversations and work reviews, focusing on whether the curriculum prepares all learners, including those with SEND, for their next steps.
Providers should design a curriculum by identifying the apprenticeship standard’s knowledge, skills, and behaviours, planning a logical sequence of teaching, and developing relevant materials and assessments. They must ensure the curriculum supports progression, addresses learner and employer needs, and includes regular performance reviews to refine and improve delivery, aligning with intent, implementation, and impact.